FIFA 21 UCL TOTGS Ciro Immobile - Requirements, Rewards, Estimated Costs, Player Review & more

The Team of the Group Stage content continues!

Lazio forward Ciro Immobile is the latest man to join the lineup, and he's available right now via this limited-time SBC.

UCL TOTGS Ciro Immobile

The Italian forward has been banging them in for fun during the group stage and has been rewarded with this 88-rated card.

Here is everything that you need to know.

Start & Expiry Date

Start Date: Tuesday, December 8 - 6pm UK

Expiry Date: Tuesday, December 15 - 6pm UK

Requirements & Rewards

EA are asking for two squads in return for the Italian forward.

The requirements for both are as follows:

Lazio

  • Lazio Players: Minimum One
  • Team of the Week Players: Minimum One
  • Team Rating: Minimum 83
  • Team Chemistry: Minimum 75
  • Reward: One Jumbo Gold Pack

Serie A TIM

  • Serie A Players: Minimum One
  • Team Rating: Minimum 84
  • Team Chemistry: Minimum 70
  • Reward: One Small Rare Mixed Players Pack

Estimated Cost

At time of writing, the estimated costs are as follows:

  • PlayStation: 84k
  • Xbox: 87k

Player Review

Under 100k for an 88-rated TOTGS striker from a top-five league seems too good to be true, surely?

Well, it's not.

To be fair, in terms of meta players, Immobile isn't one of the greatest. His 85-rated pace is okay but 83-rated acceleration isn't great for those wanting their strikers to get in behind.

His 85-rated dribbling atones for that somewhat, but not to the degree that you'd hope for your main striker.

expand image

His shooting, however, is very, very good!

89-rated shooting includes 94-rated positioning and 94-rated finishing, which is about as good as you'll get at this point in FIFA. His 4* weak foot means he should be comfortable finishing from just around anywhere in that final third.

If target men strikers - the likes of a Robert Lewandowski or a Harry Kane - are your thing, then Immobile is your man.

If you're more of a get in behind man - think Martial or Mbappe - then we'd steer clear of this one.